Build vs buy
One ad-hoc run in-house works. At scale, home-made setups quickly break — high-speed, cost-efficient, auto-maintaining runs are what we've built.
Who's going to fix your tests every time your UI changes?
Agents re-learn flows, update tests, and adapt to UI changes — coverage stays alive without manual effort.
When a test fails intermittently, who decides if it's a real bug or just a flake?
Edge-case generation plus infra tuned for determinism — fewer flakes, less manual triage.
Will you build orchestration, retries, isolation, logging, and storage to run tests at scale?
Hundreds of parallel cloud agents — orchestration, scheduling, and debugging included.
Does your setup remember how your product works — or start from scratch every session?
Agents learn from your docs, runs, and bugs — knowledge compounds over time.
Is your internal setup good enough to put in front of clients and external testers?
A polished platform you can hand to clients, agencies, and external UAT participants.
Who wires up dashboards, Slack alerts, and pulls together the logs when something breaks?
Recordings, network traces, and logs delivered to your tools — debug without digging.
Who ships auth, roles, audit logs, security — and keeps it all running?
Managed platform with access control, audit trail, and uptime — ready for your team on day one.
Who keeps test generation, CI, and reporting wired together in your repo?
Real Playwright code in your repo, executed by your CI — no proprietary runner, no lock-in.
Who tracks new technologies, model releases, API changes, and browser updates?
We absorb model and infra churn — your tests keep running on current and future tooling.
Rough math — test upkeep plus the time spent chasing model, API, and browser changes.
~$8,000/month
vs. vikingQA from $199/mo